English · This & That · Tips

How To…Export Tracks From Garageband

Hello, David Jones from http://www.mixasylum.co.uk again with a blog not about production tips today, but a process that people perhaps take from granted, but for some can be a challenging aspect of getting their tracks professionally mixed or mastered. I would like to explain the export process of Garageband.

This problem came up with a client I was working with this week, so I thought, “why don’t I try to help fellow readers in a similar situation?”  For this example, I am using Garageband ’09. So, let’s get started shall we?

How to export individual tracks from Garageband

1. In the window with all your tracks, press the speaker icon on all of the tracks you want to mute. This will ensure only the file you want is heard in the bounce. The track that will be hard turns an orange colour, the tracks which won’t be heard turn grey.

bild1

2. To export your soloed track, press ‘Share’ and then select ‘Send Song to iTunes’ from the top Garageband menu.

bild23.     A menu pops up where you can name your playlist (and other details) where the file will go in iTunes. Press Share, and the track begins to export

bild3

PLEASE NOTE that this is only a playlist where all the tracks will be held from this session, which means you can’t name individual tracks yet.

4.   iTunes now appears, so scroll down until you find your playlist name.

bild45. Click on the playlist, and it will open, showing the track(s) that have just been bounced. As you can see, the track defaults to the same name as the playlist. It is best to rename your tracks as you bounce them, as you would probably get confused with 20 tracks all called the same thing!

bild56. Click on the name of the track until a cursor appears. This lets you be able to change the name of the individual track. When you’ve renamed it, press enter on your keyboard.

bild6

7. Repeat the above steps until all of your individual tracks are in the iTunes playlist.

8. Job done!

The final word

I know this process may seem like sucking eggs to some, but I just want to help out people who are just starting out in production be able to find their feet so that they are able to hear their own compositions as a professional .AIF file for the first time. I remember when I did my first bounce and heard my compositions for the first time; it was a joyous feeling knowing my tracks had portability for the first time.

If you want to discuss anything about this blog, please feel free to get in touch with me via email at:

techniques-mixasylum@hotmail.co.uk or send a message through my facebook page at: http://www.facebook.com/mixasylum

Any feedback is appreciated, good or bad, or if you’ve got personal tips on the exporting process of Garageband, then I’d love to hear from you.

Thanks, look out for my next blog!

David Jones

http://www.mixasylum.co.uk

English · Tips

Music Industry Changes

Allen_20JohnstonArticle by Allen Johnston

Today’s music business is heading rapidly toward entertainment industry structural changes, the laws and regulations we use for our everyday business are morphing into a totally new set.  Greater interest in direct digital licensing among publishers, efforts to establish Pan-European licensing and the creation of a global repertoire database are reshaping the landscape being navigated by Writers, Publishers and  Performing Rights Organizations (ASCAP, BMI, SESAC, etc…) worldwide

Outlets, businesses, independent labels and some major labels are not renewing their digital agreements with the performing Rights Organizations (ASCAP, BMI, SESAC, etc…)  A number of large digital music users, including Clear Channel, Entercom and Sirius XM, have negotiated direct licenses with various music labels in an effort to lower the rates that these services pay for music royalties. Future changes in the entertainment industry will include PRO (Performing Rights Organizations) having smaller revenue bases and possibly charging higher percentage rates or even dedicated service charges.

For in-store business music services (also called background music services, or business establishment services), one of the largest companies negotiated a direct deal with one of the largest music publishers – and the negotiated prices eventually were found by rate courts to be the best evidence of the market price, which were used to set the price that ALL players in the market pay to ASCAP and BMI.

We once thought that Regardless of what happens in the digital market, PROs will always have general performance licensing to fall back on because monitoring song plays at bars, clubs and stores requires boots on the ground to track.  Technology is changing that concept by monitoring on line streaming events, “live” and recorded shows and the design of tracking software for cloud storage of music & video files.

New online services now enable the music industry to do business (as never before) by providing the searching, previewing,  license pricing, contracts, invoices and download access needed to foster efficient, professional relationships between the music creators and the industry people needing to license their tracks for an unlimited variety of commercial media projects.

The new music industry has been ushered in with a swift change of leadership and direction.  Many foolish people still hold on to ancient concepts and believe that the Black radio & record community will revive itself.  This is NOT going to happen, for everything must change.  My generation made the music industry an industry of “smoke & mirrors” where companies and individuals were paying thousands of dollars just to tell a LIE about their music.  The reasoning was that a major label would pick them up, pay them and make them a star.  Technology, even though still used to perpetuate LIES, has made several common place entertainment entities completely worthless.

RETAIL PROMOTION – Hiring people that would make sure that your song got Sound Scan reports every week and assist you in “hyping” the charts.  No longer is it necessary for there are no independent records on the charts to be hyped.

RETAIL TRACKING – Seems like there is no one who really cares about where your record is physically or digitally located and what it is doing on a weekly basis.  So there’s no one left who calls retail on a regular rotation.

RADIO PROMOTION – The KING of hype games is still being played but on a much larger, more expensive level.  Today you can pay a promoter $25,000 to $65,000 just to get spins at night, during mix shows and on weekends.  This can get you into the Billboard charts, however you haven’t sold any music and you still have to spend money to have your artist work promotional dates.   For $80,000 – $250,000 you can have your music placed on air (depending on the stations format), BDS (Broadcast Data Service) reported and eventually Billboard charted.  However since NONE of this promotion is truthful you still have to find another way to sell physical and digital product to the masses.

RADIO TRACKING – This was a given job for hundreds of label secretaries and interns, now there are no lists of songs for the station to give out, no one within the station who even makes a decision on music or relationships between the caller and the station.  Independently owned music is not even being played on terrestrial radio under any format except non-commercial.

VIDEO PROMOTION – Who tracks your video plays, has the relationship with the major video television companies or even owns a list of the available television programs to send your video to?  Of course there is You Tube and multiple online outlets, but who knows that your video is on You Tube?

RECORD POOLS – When DJ’s were playing records, then you needed someone who knew the most popular club DJ’s and could get your music to them PLUS get feedback on your tune.  The advent of MP3 technology coupled with the shady, money hungry actions of Record Pool Directors has made this type of company totally unreliable and unnecessary.   The reasoning behind even having a Record Pool was to give unbiased feedback directly from the “end user” (audience), today your feedback is coming from Facebook, Twitter, Reverb Nation, You Tube, etc..

INDEPENDENT RETAIL STORES – Sure there are still a few stores left in certain neighborhoods around the United States, the biggest transformation is that they are selling music as a sideline.  Their front line business is clothing, drug paraphernalia, household accessories or hair care products.  An extremely few specialty stores are making Sound Scan reports, but most of those can be bought and have no honest relevancy.

BILLBOARD – The Billboard charts were once used as a list for the record retailer to purchase from.  Customers would come in, look over the list, normally posted on a wall or bin, and make their purchases. As a record label you had to chart your record to justify sales, improve airplay and get wholesalers to pay you what they already owed you.  It truly was the bible of the music industry.  No longer is it necessary to “climb” the charts to become a musical success.  The “bible of the industry” has become the “comic book” of the major labels.

INDEPENDENT DISTRIBUTORS – These are the wholesalers that operate as middlemen between the label and the retailer.  Because the chain system (Best But, Target, K-Mart, etc…) now controls the majority of sales of recorded music, these distributors have a much tighter and smaller inventory and some malicious games for the label.  As a label you must pay for distributors’ promotion, marketing, place and positioning within stores, special programs and if your product sits on the wholesalers’ floor more than 30 days you pay for storage.

ONESTOP – a smaller wholesaler that has almost disappeared from the industry landscape, while most were specialty record orientated there inventory was never large. The majority went out of business based on outstanding debts coupled with mobile music trading, purchasing, streaming and video.

I am truly glad for the change that has over taken the music industry.  Today you can own your music completely and sell directly to the consumer without any middlemen.  By the way, for all you old timers that wishes for the good old lying, hyping and buying reports days to come back.  Keep dreaming.

English · Tips

Understanding… Logic Pro’s Match EQ

Hello,

my name is David Jones and I am the founder and Producer for Mix Asylum a new post-production venture from the UK (http://www.mixasylum.co.uk). I’ve kindly been given permission by Sara Shirazi to write a number of guest blogs for Music2Deal and I hope you will find them useful. I am going to be talking about a range of software and techniques in future blogs, this first article being about Logic Pro’s “Match EQ” technique.

Where do I find “Match EQ?”

Match EQ is a process available in Logic Pro 9. It looks like this…

1grafik

…and is found in Logic via the following way:

2grafikFor this demonstration, I am using the “Edgy Rock Guitar 02” loop to show you the sound characteristics of Match EQ. Please take a listen to the audio link towards the bottom of the page so you can truly appreciate Match EQ:

What is “Match EQ?”

I’d first like to explore what Match EQ means to myself as a mixing engineer before a factual definition is applied.

Someone once said to me “Match EQ is for people who can’t EQ properly”. I think this is an unfair view of the process. I personally use Match EQ as a starting point on all of my mixes and would have difficulty without it. I use it as a tool to ‘sweep’ a soundsource(s) spectrum.

I do this so that I can hear what a source sounds like in extreme spectrums of EQ. When I talk about spectrum of EQ, I mean the lowest, bottom end frequency to the thinnest, high end frequency. Sometimes, I have a clear view in my minds eye of what I think a source should ‘sound’ like (whether it be a warm, low end definition, or a ‘sparkly’ high end tone) and I regularly use Match EQ to go to this idea first to see if my idea pays off. Sometimes I do get the right sound from mind to ear, but most times, Match EQ surprises and excites me with a sound I was not expecting, and it suddenly becomes a centre piece in a mix (where previously it might have been a subtle nuance).

Here is Apple’s description of Match EQ:

“Match EQ is a learning equalizer that analyzes the frequency spectrum of an audio signal such as an audio file, a channel strip input signal, or a template. The average frequency spectrum of the source file (the template) and of the current material (this can be the entire project or individual channel strips within it) is analyzed. These two spectra are then matched, creating a filter curve. This filter curve adapts the frequency response of the current material to match that of the template. Before applying the filter curve, you can modify it by boosting or cutting any number of frequencies, or by inverting the curve”.

[Apple Inc, no date].

I’ll discuss the ‘matching’ information shortly…

How do I use “Match EQ?”

The process of using Match EQ is incredibly simple, and works like this:

1. With the audio file you wish to process playing, press ‘Template Learn’

3grafik

2. The Audio file is now being processed by ‘Match EQ’

4grafik3. VERY IMPORTANT – ALWAYS stop the audio file playing, as the sound will now be altered to the deepest, lowest-end frequency and it is outputted at a very loud volume because of this. Your ears will thank you, believe me!!!!

4. With the audio file stopped playing, press ‘Match’

5grafik5. The EQ spectrum for the audio file is now outputted.

6grafik6. Manipulate the ‘Apply’ Lever to shape the sound of your source

7grafikThat really is all there is to it, now it’s up to your ears to do the hard work!

How is “Match EQ?” used to shape my mix?

Remember earlier when I mentioned about matching a sound source? If the above wasn’t already useful to your soundsources, Match EQ has a great trick that can really take your mix to the next level!

Say you’ve now got a perfect guitar shape/EQ tone that you want to use across your other guitars, but you don’t want the hassle of trying to exactly replicate the process just in case something goes wrong? No problem! Simply press ‘copy’ on your original Match EQ window, open a new Match EQ on your 2nd guitar (for example), press ‘paste’ and there you have it, an exact duplication of your settings.

You might now be saying “David, this is all well and good, but why would I want duplicates?” On guitar for example, it could be useful to form a ‘bed’ of guitar layers, and obviously having the same EQ tones would make them sound like a ‘wall’ for the mix.

Drums are also a very good use for Match EQ, sometimes I use different ‘tones’ to help shape my snare so that it has more realism of the bottom and top end of the hit. Kick drums also have more depth to them with Match EQ applied.

Basically, if you just want some consistency to a mix, look no further than Match EQ. Obviously, more processing may be needed on the signal as a whole for a full instrument mix, but it is a very useful and creative starting point that I wholeheartedly recommend.

Match EQ sound examples

Now I’ve discussed the principles of Match EQ, why don’t we have a listen to some of its sound shaping characteristics? Before that though, let me just explain how I set-up this demonstration.

I imported the original dry, unprocessed “Edgy Rock Guitar 02” into Logic Pro 9, which by itself is a bar lasting for four seconds. I made three duplicate channels spaced equally apart (the dry loop starts at 0:00 – 0:04, a deeper EQ loop starts at 0:05 – 0:08 etc) and each three duplicates have a different EQ characteristic, as shown in these screenshots:

8grafikLoop 1 is unprocessed.

9grafikA deeper form of EQ for loop 2, enhancing more of the bass frequencies    around -15dB.

10grafikLoop 3 – This EQ setting has more of an even setting across the frequency spectrum, which means not one particular frequency band is prominent in the sound.

11grafikLoop 4 – The high frequencies of the guitar are now more prominent, giving the tone a ‘bright’ type of sound.

Each sample lasts for 0:04 seconds each, but I have duplicated these tracks three times, meaning the total playing time of the audio file is 0:49 seconds.

Please take a listen to the following demonstration of what Match EQ can do for your tracks!

https://soundcloud.com/techniques-mixasylum/match-eq-demonstration

The final word

I hope I’ve shown through the audio example above how much scope you can achieve on your soundsource through using Match EQ. In my eyes, it gives a user much more chance to experiment within the wider sound spectrum without necessarily altering the sound to cater for this at the recording stage, allowing your dry files to be just that – original files which can be further enriched at the mixing stage.

The sound examples are obviously taken from the extremes of the stereo spectrum for this example; the main focus for Match EQ is personal experimentation, there is no right or wrong way to EQ a particular sound, just let your imagination loose and see where it goes!

If you want to discuss anything about this blog, please feel free to get in touch with me via email at: techniques-mixasylum@hotmail.co.uk or send a message through my facebook page at http://www.facebook.com/mixasylum

Any feedback is appreciated, good or bad, or even if you’ve got personal tips on how you use Match EQ, I’d love to hear from you.

Also remember to check out my soundcloud for future demonstrations of production techniques:

https://soundcloud.com/techniques-mixasylum

Thanks, look out for my next blog!

David Jones

http://www.mixasylum.co.uk