a&r · music business · music industry · Music2Deal.com · This & That

AI Will Not Replace Creativity. It Will Redefine How We Create.

Every technological revolution in music has been accompanied by the same question:

“Will this replace musicians?”

Today, the debate revolves around Artificial Intelligence. Thirty years ago, it was about digital samplers. Before that, it was synthesizers, drum machines and digital recording.

History has shown us something interesting: technology rarely replaces creativity. Instead, it changes the way we express it.

Early in my career, I worked as a sound designer for companies such as Angel City Audio and Valhala, creating sound libraries and sample collections for Korg and Roland instruments. At the time, many believed that sampling technology would make musicians obsolete.

It didn’t.

The opposite happened.

It gave producers, composers and musicians new creative possibilities while preserving what has always mattered most: artistic vision.

Later, while producing orchestral soundtracks for television, including projects for Brazil’s TV Globo such as Hilda Furacão, we combined digital samplers with real orchestras and live musicians. Technology became part of the creative process, not a substitute for it.

Today, AI represents another extraordinary leap forward.

Independent creators now have access to production tools that were once available only in world-class recording studios. That is a remarkable democratization of music production.

But access to technology has never been the same as artistic identity.

Artificial Intelligence can suggest harmonies, generate arrangements, create sounds and even produce complete tracks.

What it cannot replace is the artistic intention behind every creative decision.

The personality of an artist is not found in the software they use.

It is found in their choices.

In their taste.

In their cultural references.

In the emotions they decide to communicate.

This is why I believe AI should be embraced as a creative partner rather than a creative replacement.

A good example is the growing number of artists who deliberately choose to combine modern production techniques with live performances to create distinctive sonic identities. The goal is not to reject technology but to use it intentionally, ensuring that every artistic decision reflects a unique creative vision rather than simply accepting the first result generated by an algorithm.

The real challenge for today’s creators is no longer learning how to use AI.

It is learning how to remain recognizable in a world where everyone has access to the same tools.

Because audiences rarely connect with technology.

They connect with authenticity.

As the music industry continues to evolve, our greatest competitive advantage will not be the software we use.

It will be our ability to transform technology into something deeply human.

Technology will continue to evolve.

Creativity will continue to define us.

How do you use AI in your creative process?
Do you see it primarily as a creative assistant, a production tool, or something that could fundamentally change the role of composers and producers? I’d love to hear your perspective and continue this conversation with the Music2Deal community.

→ View profile on Music2Deal: https://music2deal.com/br/danielsilveiramusica

Join for free and become part of the international Music Business Network:

https://www.music2deal.com/site/register

English

The State Of the Music Industry Is Bad,But It Has Still Seen Worse Days

While more music is being produced these days than ever before, this high production does not necessarily equate to the highest revenue of all time. In fact, it actually has equated to rather the opposite end of the spectrum.

2014 saw the smallest weekly sum for album sales since data tracking first began in the early nineties. This downward spiral included an 11-month wait for any artist to sell a million copies of a studio album, until Taylor Swift finally broke this dry spell when her album ‘1989’ dropped at the end of last year.

The landscape of the music industry has shifted considerably due to one main factor. The wonder, or nightmare rather, that is online music streaming. The music business body, the British Phonographic Industry (BPI) has recently reported that Britons streamed 14.8bn tracks in 2014, twice the figure of 7.5bn in 2013, as internet connectivity becomes more reliable and more engrained into our everyday lives.

To put a positive spin on it though, things could definitely be worse. With some historical context shed on the situation, we can see that the music industry has definitely seen worse days. In the 1920’s and the 1930’s, the arrival of free music ultimately led to the industry downsizing to a mere 5% of its previous stature and size. This reduction lasted for two whole decades until the 1940’s when the jukebox made a firm and game-altering appearance, in which people were invited to pay to hear music again.

It is needless to say music has come a long way since the invention of the jukebox…or has it? People are still creating playlists, and lining up their tracks, only difference is that now it is all occurs online. This time though, instead of aiding the music industry, it is actually crippling it, almost to the point of an actual break. Online streaming figures have zoomed from zero in 2007 to £76.7m in 2013.

Additionally, thanks to the explosion of YouTube, music labels are raking up millions of extra dollars a month thanks to YouTube advertising. So this additional money being pumped back into the music industry can make up for lack of music sales for the time being. This is why mainstream artists will release, 4, 5 or even 6 singles form each of their albums, each with their own music video. This is good news for video production companies, and for the artists who feel that Spotify and other online streaming platforms are ‘ruining their lives’.

As it turns out, the music industry has been thrown more than one lifeline. As a result of the cost of fuel decreasing, it now costs less to tour, which of course means more profit on ticket sales. The 12 January has marked a five-year low, which is great news for us all, including the touring industry, artists can add more dates to their tour, at a lower cost.

 by Chloe Hashemi

English

What Happened To Midem? – “Things aren’t what they used to be”

Virtual Conferences for the world’s largest music market Midem was unusually quiet. I remember the organized madness that Midem once shared. The LIVE performers scheduled hourly at selected spots within the exhibition hall, the continuous playing of music at a multitude of visitor stands. The Midem sponsored nightly concerts at multiple hotel ballrooms, parties held by different governments just to showcase their best music and musicians. Gone are the days of leaving one fabulous concert, just to walk next door or down the block to another. I miss the abundance of free music given out to attendees just so they may eventually listen, talk about and ultimately purchase quantities for sale in their respective markets.

The experience of discovery is lacking while digital media is supposed to bring the industry closer. Things aren’t what they used to be. Executives at this year’s Midem conference have come up with a unique usage of today’s technology. VIRTUAL CONFERENCING Oh, you say it’s not a NEW idea, well imagine this scenario. You register for the conference online, paying your registration fee digitally. You then troll the online database of the conference attendees and schedule your appointment for a private online meeting time. At your designated time you connect visually and have a one on one meeting digitally with the person you have chosen. During the meeting you share music or video file that be saved or seen and you get immediate feedback.

What I heard during Midem were facts and figures, “My song has 600,000 YouTube views, My Sound cloud has been downloaded 800,000 times, I now have over a million followers on Twitter. What I didn’t hear was the music itself. Sure a few people had MP3 players, jump drives, iPhone with a cloud file, one meeting I took from the UK even had a portable CD player with ear buds. Yet this was the exception NOT the norm. The numbers game was what ruled this conference. Most companies were interested in having 5,000,000 songs on file where anyone could research for the song they wanted or needed. I’m predicting that there will be a change in how the Business of Music selling works very soon. Most people are lazy yet want instant gratification while the successful industry executive works daily in developing lasting relationships and NOT online hype. The day of the Song Plugger is fast approaching, the need for personalize service for publishers, writers, musicians and labels is mandatory.

 

Will this happen virtually? Only time will tell…

by Allen Johnston